Zachary Hewlett
Coal Mining was affected by the Industrial Revolution, but not in enough ways to make it really all that safe. It made it easier, though; machinery to blow up, collect, and move the coal, instead of muscle power. This makes it much more efficient, and more importantly, more humane, than getting mothers, fathers, and even children to do it. These machines did a lot of good for this industry, but I wonder if some coal mining companies thought getting the machines was pointless, maybe they felt the system that was being used back then was better than getting technology to do it for them? In any case, chalk this industrial advancement up to efficiency!
Minh Ngo
The industry of coal mining was the riskiest of jobs around, some maybe more than others but they were all listed as hazardous to our health. The Industrial improved the conditions of the coal miners by improving the ventilation, the transportation, etc., however this job still continues to be considered hazardous to our health. Not only did the Industrial Revolution made coal mining slightly safer, but it also has improved the efficiency of coal mining with the machinery and equipment designed to help the miners. Economies and morality has always been in conflict because to create an economy out of this, many has to suffer the issues it brings. The owner of mining companies understand this but they still force families to work endlessly to get them the coal they want to sell. It is not always possible to satisfy both at the same time because one has to give up up in order to satisfy one. However, the Industrial Revolution has manage some how, to somewhat satisfy each side a bit.
How was it possible for the Industrial Revolution to somewhat satisfy both morality and economy?
Aisha Kazi In these paragraphs coal mining is described to be a very dangerous job at the most compared to death. It is said to be a very hazardous job. However over year’s improvement have come, by improved ventilation underground, underground transportation, and has been made more safe.As it says that coal mining was a hard and dangerous job, it also mentions that it made big changes and increased in its production in great amount. Last but not the least it mentions that people at the mines was not only men at the 19th century. It was even women and families who worked side by side. They faced harsh conditions.Question:Do coal miners still face harsh conditions and are forced to work in hazardous jobs?This is an example of how morality and economics are always in conflict, because for the economy people are made to work in hazardous situations and risk their lives. They have no choice and we can see that morality and economics don’t get along really well.
Zachary Hewlett
Coal Mining was affected by the Industrial Revolution, but not in enough ways to make it really all that safe. It made it easier, though; machinery to blow up, collect, and move the coal, instead of muscle power. This makes it much more efficient, and more importantly, more humane, than getting mothers, fathers, and even children to do it. These machines did a lot of good for this industry, but I wonder if some coal mining companies thought getting the machines was pointless, maybe they felt the system that was being used back then was better than getting technology to do it for them? In any case, chalk this industrial advancement up to efficiency!
Minh Ngo
The industry of coal mining was the riskiest of jobs around, some maybe more than others but they were all listed as hazardous to our health. The Industrial improved the conditions of the coal miners by improving the ventilation, the transportation, etc., however this job still continues to be considered hazardous to our health. Not only did the Industrial Revolution made coal mining slightly safer, but it also has improved the efficiency of coal mining with the machinery and equipment designed to help the miners. Economies and morality has always been in conflict because to create an economy out of this, many has to suffer the issues it brings. The owner of mining companies understand this but they still force families to work endlessly to get them the coal they want to sell. It is not always possible to satisfy both at the same time because one has to give up up in order to satisfy one. However, the Industrial Revolution has manage some how, to somewhat satisfy each side a bit.
How was it possible for the Industrial Revolution to somewhat satisfy both morality and economy?
Aisha Kazi
In these paragraphs coal mining is described to be a very dangerous job at the most compared to death. It is said to be a very hazardous job. However over year’s improvement have come, by improved ventilation underground, underground transportation, and has been made more safe. As it says that coal mining was a hard and dangerous job, it also mentions that it made big changes and increased in its production in great amount. Last but not the least it mentions that people at the mines was not only men at the 19th century. It was even women and families who worked side by side. They faced harsh conditions.Question: Do coal miners still face harsh conditions and are forced to work in hazardous jobs?This is an example of how morality and economics are always in conflict, because for the economy people are made to work in hazardous situations and risk their lives. They have no choice and we can see that morality and economics don’t get along really well.